Removal of Cases of Odd Sugar Entrepreneurs
Id Nasional. Money Laundering Legal Expert, Yenti Ganarsih, considered that the termination of the case of alleged fraud and TPPU with the reported sugar entrepreneur Gunawan Jusuf was an odd matter.
Yenti argued that the Attorney General's Office was rather in a hurry to set an Order for Termination of Investigation (SP3) to the investigators of the Indonesian Police Criminal Investigation Agency in this case. Although he admitted that this case had happened for a long time and reached 18 years.
"I also followed this case. The case happened in 1999 if it was not wrong, it was reported in 2004, it was reported again last year. Indeed, it has been quite long," Yenti said in Jakarta, Friday, December 21, 2018.
Yenti said, the thing that was quite strange was when the prosecutor's office set the SP3 while the new police issued an Order for the Commencement of Investigation (SPDP) and there were no suspects. "This is rather odd, only SPDP, but it has been SP3, even though it hasn't been done yet, it hasn't been explored yet," he said.
While the reasons for expiration, said Yenti, might arise because so far the prosecutor's office or police have calculated the time, has it reached 18 years. "Indeed this case is rather complicated, because there is involvement of the reported wife, and now divorced, the information is different. also in my opinion, "he said.
Yenti said that if the SP3 had been properly issued, he advised the reporter to take the civil route. "It can be sued civilly, because this is a complicated crime," he said.
Meanwhile, the Head of the Public Information Bureau of the National Police Public Relations Division Brigadier General Dedi Prasetyo said the SP3 case was in accordance with the referral from the prosecutor and the results of the case. He also invited if the reporter made an attempt at a pretrial request related to this SP3.
"If there is a pretrial attempt (against SP3), then that is someone's constitutional right," said Dedi.
Meanwhile, Attorney Gunawan Jusuf, Marx Andryan, did not answer when contacted.
As is known, in a letter from the Director of the Tipideksus received by the journalist, dated December 14, 2018, to the Deputy Attorney General for General Crimes, it was stated that the investigation into the case was stopped by law.
The letter numbered B / 279B / XII / RES.2.3 / 2018 / Dit Tipidesksus, also contains the reason for the termination of the investigation because Nebis is idem and expired. Whereas before, the police stated that they would pursue evidence to foreign countries.
The alleged embezzlement and TPPU began when the reporter Toh Keng Siong invested his funds in PT Makindo with the Managing Director, Gunawan Jusuf. From 1999 to 2002, the total funds invested in the form of Time Deposits reached hundreds of millions of US dollars in the form of Time Deposits.
Toh Keh Siong's lawyer, Denny Kailimang, suspects Gunawan of using the loan funds to buy a sugar factory through the IBRA auction and then does not return the money until now.
Yenti argued that the Attorney General's Office was rather in a hurry to set an Order for Termination of Investigation (SP3) to the investigators of the Indonesian Police Criminal Investigation Agency in this case. Although he admitted that this case had happened for a long time and reached 18 years.
"I also followed this case. The case happened in 1999 if it was not wrong, it was reported in 2004, it was reported again last year. Indeed, it has been quite long," Yenti said in Jakarta, Friday, December 21, 2018.
Yenti said, the thing that was quite strange was when the prosecutor's office set the SP3 while the new police issued an Order for the Commencement of Investigation (SPDP) and there were no suspects. "This is rather odd, only SPDP, but it has been SP3, even though it hasn't been done yet, it hasn't been explored yet," he said.
While the reasons for expiration, said Yenti, might arise because so far the prosecutor's office or police have calculated the time, has it reached 18 years. "Indeed this case is rather complicated, because there is involvement of the reported wife, and now divorced, the information is different. also in my opinion, "he said.
Yenti said that if the SP3 had been properly issued, he advised the reporter to take the civil route. "It can be sued civilly, because this is a complicated crime," he said.
Meanwhile, the Head of the Public Information Bureau of the National Police Public Relations Division Brigadier General Dedi Prasetyo said the SP3 case was in accordance with the referral from the prosecutor and the results of the case. He also invited if the reporter made an attempt at a pretrial request related to this SP3.
"If there is a pretrial attempt (against SP3), then that is someone's constitutional right," said Dedi.
Meanwhile, Attorney Gunawan Jusuf, Marx Andryan, did not answer when contacted.
As is known, in a letter from the Director of the Tipideksus received by the journalist, dated December 14, 2018, to the Deputy Attorney General for General Crimes, it was stated that the investigation into the case was stopped by law.
The letter numbered B / 279B / XII / RES.2.3 / 2018 / Dit Tipidesksus, also contains the reason for the termination of the investigation because Nebis is idem and expired. Whereas before, the police stated that they would pursue evidence to foreign countries.
The alleged embezzlement and TPPU began when the reporter Toh Keng Siong invested his funds in PT Makindo with the Managing Director, Gunawan Jusuf. From 1999 to 2002, the total funds invested in the form of Time Deposits reached hundreds of millions of US dollars in the form of Time Deposits.
Toh Keh Siong's lawyer, Denny Kailimang, suspects Gunawan of using the loan funds to buy a sugar factory through the IBRA auction and then does not return the money until now.
Comments
Post a Comment